Or asking the OS:Property Ombudsman to "investigate" a complaint against a fee-paying member. (633)

To the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Secretary / Chair of Ombudsman Services / Health Secretary / CEO Livewell South West Ltd.

For Clarity - Attempt 633.

"Putting the Department of Health In Charge Of The Contaminated Blood Inquiry Is Akin To Asking South Yorkshire Police To Lead Hillsborough Probe" Diana Johnson Labour MP.

633) Or asking the OS:Property Ombudsman to "investigate" a complaint against a fee-paying member.

Dear Mr Hunt, Lord Tim Clement Jones, Mr Hunt and Professor Waite,

Diana Johnson, the Labour MP for Hull North, is perfectly correct when she says, "Putting the Department of Health in charge of the contaminated blood inquiry is akin to asking South Yorkshire Police to lead Hillsborough probe."

Our world is being rigged from top to bottom by those who refuse to answer questions and who choose instead to operate behind the scenes.

Choosing not to answer questions has become standard operating practice by those who command the political and consumer landscape. From government ministers to senior executives at private redress schemes.

The Contaminated Blood Scandal is yet another example of how conflicts of interest are becoming standard operating practice in a democracy where the Conservative Party is becoming increasingly non-transparent and unaccountable whilst all the time seeking to grab, control and hold on to executive power. Hence the Henry VIII clauses in the Great Repeal Bill.

It is almost unimaginable the Hillsborough victims had to wait nearly 30 years. for justice to arrive. What an insult to them. And then there are the victims of Orgreave who thanks to Amber Rudd's need to protect Thatcher's already tarnished reputation, are left still waiting for justice.

The Conservative Party are at least united on one thing for sure - the need to conserve a system that enshrines injustice and protects the perpetrators of those injustices no matter what the cost.

Otherwise things would be different.

What must be of concern for anyone who is passionate about truth, fairness and justice in post-Brexit Britain are the day-to-day scandals of healthcare professionals, private investigating officers and ombudsmen who - with the tacit knowledge of their CEO's and regulators - are handing innocent people ludicrous decisions.

Ludicrous decisions that come with both a health and wealth cost.

Q. Lord Tim Clement Jones, do you not agree that every recipient of an illogical Final Decision by your company's ombudsman deserves to have those decisions

reviewed at an independent inquiry?

Q. Professor Waite, do you not agree that every recipient of an eye-wateringly ludicrous decision by your Anonymous Desk Top Reviewers deserves to be compensated after a review by an independent inquiry?

Q. Mr Clark, why does government still approve the Ombudsman Services:Property private redress scheme when it no longer publishes any meaningful data on its performance - how can consumers know if it is as "fair" and "independent" as it claims?

Q. Mr hunt, how can you condone a system that employs Anonymous Desk Top Reviewers to make decisions that involve such substantial sums of money?

Where is the transparency and accountability?

Yours sincerely,

Steve Gilbert - Workstock number 510458.