Ombudsman Services: What's Really Needed Is A Far Harsher Monitoring And Enforcement Strategy For A Truly Fair And Independent ADR Scheme. (42)
To: The Leader of the House of Commons / The Business Secretary and Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government.
Ombudsman Services Part 4: The Full English Cover-Up (42)
42) What's Really Needed Is A Far Harsher Monitoring And Enforcement Strategy For A Truly Fair And Independent ADR Scheme.
Dear Mrs Leadsom, Mr Clark and Mr Javid,
At the same time as Theresa May, the then Home Secretary, was stoking the fires of prejudice, racism and hate with her two vans carrying the stark message to, "Go home or face arrest" we were attempting to warn the Government about those unfortunate people who'd; purchased homes with catalogues of faults, complained about dud surveys and surveyors to what turned out to be the surveyors' very own ombudsman and who got farcical, illogical, eyewateringly ludicrous ombudsman decisions to add to their woes.
Q. Mrs Leadsom, why did none of those responsible for this fiasco face arrest?
The Guardian informs us that;
Amber Rudd boasted of harsher immigration strategy, leak reveals
Exclusive: home secretary told PM she would give officials more ‘teeth’ to deport migrants
Amber Rudd promised in a letter to Theresa May that she would deport thousands more illegal migrants. Photograph: Leon Neal/Getty Images
Amber Rudd privately boasted to the prime minister that she would give immigration officials more “teeth” to hunt down and deport thousands more illegal migrants and accelerate the UK’s deportation programme, a leaked private letter has revealed. Q. Mr Clark and Mr Javid, why weren't Government monitors given a set of sharper teeth to hunt down cowboy RICS surveyors and their dodgy sheriff - the one who let them ride rough-shod over their clients? In a robust private memo to Theresa May just months before long-settled Windrush migrants were threatened with deportation, Rudd set out her “ambitious” plan to increase removals and focus officials on “arresting, detaining and forcibly removing illegal migrants” while “ruthlessly” prioritising Home Office resources to that programme .
Q. Mrs Leadsom, why haven't Government monitors of the Government approved Ombudsman Services:Property redress scheme ruthlessly applied the requirements set out by the OFT and which have regularly been ignored by those maladministering the scheme? Q. Mrs Leadsom, why haven't those who engage in maladministration been arrested?
The four-page document, obtained exclusively by the Guardian, reveals Rudd promised the prime minister she would oversee the forced or voluntary departure of 10% more people than May managed when she was home secretary, partly by switching money for crime-fighting to her immigration enforcement programme. Her goal implied she wanted to throw out an extra 4,000 illegal migrants every year. The letter was sent on 30 January 2017. A few months later Paulette Wilson, a grandmother from Jamaica who had lived in Britain for 50 years, became the first of more than 20 Windrush migrants to tell the Guardian how they were facing deportation or a loss of rights to health, housing and work because of Home Office policy
A paragraph from Amber Rudd’s letter to Theresa May. Photograph: Guardian Q. Mr Clark and Mr Javid, the intelligence and data gathered by DJS Research was NOT ruthlessly acted upon by Government officials. In fact they appear to have ignored it. Why?
The aggressive language and tone of Rudd’s approach to immigration enforcement emerged after the home secretary attempted to blame officials in her own department for the Windrush scandal in which it emerged up to 50,000 mostly Commonwealth migrants were facing possible deportation despite having lived in Britain for decades. Q. Mrs Leadsom, Mr Clark and Mr Javid, why does this Government routinely punish the innocent and cover-up the criminality of those who maladminister private justice? Rudd claimed in parliament on Monday she was “concerned that the Home Office has become too concerned with policy and strategy and sometimes loses sight of the individual”. That appeared to be an attempt to suggest she had inherited a hardline system from May, who as home secretary announced a policy to create “a really hostile environment for illegal migrants” across government departments. Q. Mr Clark, you inherited a docile, compliant, asleep on the job monitoring system from Mr Javid which has resulted in a, "farcical" (according to MoneySavingExperts) "broken solution" (according to the out-going CEO and Chief Ombudsman, Ombudsman Services). There is an urgent need for a public inquiry into this mess - when will you call for one?
But in the private memo, Rudd said she believed in the fundamental importance of that hostile environment agenda, which she referred to as the “compliant environment”, an attempted rebranding of the policy by ministers a few months earlier. Q. Mrs Leadsom, why wasn't there a, "complaint environment" at the BIS / BEIS monitoring section where it was really needed?
The culture that agenda inspired has been widely blamed for members of the Windrush-era generation being threatened in recent months with deportation and denied access to housing, healthcare and jobs. Q. Mrs Leadsom, Mr Clark and Mr Javid, the culture and agenda of fostering The Broken Solution has led to thousands of consumers being denied access to justice, why have you failed to ruthlessly defend those consumers from such criminal exploitation?
In 2016, 39,626 people were deported or left the UK voluntarily, according to the UK Migration Observatory, but Rudd’s letter to May indicates a home secretary determined to make her mark and toughen up even further an immigration enforcement regime which uses liveried vans that have become an increasingly common sight in areas with large migrant communities.
‘Illegal and would-be illegal migrants ... need to know that our immigration system has ‘teeth’, Rudd wrote. Photograph: Guardian She wrote: “Illegal and would-be illegal migrants and the public more widely, need to know that our immigration system has ‘teeth’, and that if people do not comply on their own we will enforce their return, including through arresting and detaining them. That is why I will be refocusing immigration enforcement’s work to concentrate on enforced removals. In particular I will be reallocating £10m (including from low-level crime and intelligence) with the aim of increasing the number of enforced removals by more than 10% over the next few years: something I believe is ambitious, but deliverable.”
Q. Mrs Leadsom, why hasn't Mrs Rudd's model and agenda of ruthless intimidatory bullying been applied to those slackers at the government approved and monitored ADR scheme?
Meanwhile, the thousands of victims of this ADR's, "broken solution" are left abandoned and to wait for an explanation, apology and compensation from the man who broke it.
No comments:
Post a Comment