To the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Secretary / Chair of Ombudsman Services / CEO and Chief Ombudsman Ombudsman Services and Chair The Ombudsman Association.
For Clarity - Attempt 672.
Dear Mr Clark, Lord Tim Clement Jones and The Rev Shand Smith,
It's almost a year since the Prime Minister told Conservative Party Conference,
"..that's why where markets are dysfunctional we should be prepared to intervene."
The dysfunctional market in property complaint redress is one such example.
Its dysfunctionality arises due to the RICS's conflict of interest in both regulating surveyors and determining what the effective outcome of a complaint should be once their inadequately regulated members pass their bewildered clients to an ombudsman, who is himself a member of RICS, for justice.
Q. Mr Clark, this market is dysfunctional. It is rigged in favour of the RICS member. Why haven't you intervened on behalf of the consumer?
The Prime Minister went on to state
"I want to set out my plan for a Britain where everyone plays by the same rules and everyone has the opportunity to be all they want to be."
We are in complete agreement with the Prime Minister - we also believe that everyone should play by the rules and be all they want to be - including being a whistleblower.
Q. Rev Lewis Shand Smith, why have you prevented everyone from playing by the same rules by denying all workers in ombudsman schemes the protection of a whistleblowing policy?
Mrs May went on to say,
"A plan that will mean government stepping up. Righting wrongs. Challenging vested interests. Taking big decisions. Doing what we believe to be right. Getting the job done."
Q. Lord Tim Clement Jones, the RICS clearly have a vested interest in the way property complaints are handled otherwise they would have instructed their inadequately regulated members to have resolved complaints before they escalated to having their ombudsman resolve them on their behalf. As a Liberal Democrat do you believe that to be right?
Mrs May believed it was time,
"To stand up for the weak and stand up to the strong."
Q. Rev Shand Smith, why do you stand up for the strong and stand up to the weak by denying the weak their Human Right to free expression?"
Although Mrs May thinks that government cannot not stand aside when it sees social injustice and unfairness she wants to somehow achieve such justice and fairness by abolishing the Human Rights Act.
She put the whistle to her lips but lacked the courage of her convictions and has failed to blow it. And so blew her credibility instead.
Having heard the hysterical Sir Oliver Letwin on Radio 4's pm programme this morning we would like to assure everyone that we are not agents of the Venezuelan government and neither are we Bolsheviks.
No comments:
Post a Comment