Ombudsman Services: Leave or Remain? Either Way We Want Our Justice Back. (487)

The Ombudsmans61percent Campaign at - www.blogger.com

To the Business Secretary:
For Clarity - Attempt 487.

487) Ombudsman Services: Leave or Remain? Either Way We Want Our Justice Back. 

Dear Mr Javid,
The overwhelming body of evidence collected by the experts - DJS Research - suggests that the Ombudsman Services:Property Ombudsman is biased. They state that the evidence they amassed for their 2010 Customer Satisfaction Report led them to conclude that,
"To be effective the SOS (now rebranded Ombudsman Services:Property) must be seen to be an impartial arbitrator- currently this does not seem to be the case." 

What they found was an Ombudsman who was a partial arbitrator - partial towards her fee-paying Members - and this was before the scam of cutting and pasting the Ombudsman's signature on to reports written by Investigating Officers (as a way of clearing a backlog of cases) and other practices that are not working in the complainant's interests, had been allowed to set in and fester.

When something's rotten in the state of England it is somewhat hypocritical to criticise the EU for being a rotten, remote and an expensive failure.  

Government, "monitors" of a scheme that Jonathan May approved on behalf of the taxpayer in 2009 and RICS, the world's leading property regulator so they say, have both looked the other way - for years - as the shambles at OS unfolded.

Q. Mr Javid, if Government "monitors" and the RICS  regulators continue to leave OS executives free to maladminister consumers' complaints won't justice simply remain out of the reach of the rest of us - you can't blame the EU for that, can you?

A seven year long case of the UK Government failing to govern on behalf of the people.

Yours sincerely,
Steve Gilbert - The Ombudsmans61percent Campaign.