To the Business Secretary:
For Clarity - Attempt 442.
442) At Ombudsman Services:Property 1 + 2 = 0.
Dear Mr Javid,
In our previous attempt For Clarity, we saw that Eric Schmidt, Google's very own chairman with unimpeachable integrity, gave the game away somewhat when he said that capitalism boiled down to making as much money as possible and then salting it away as effectively as possible. Hence the, "double Irish" and "double sandwich" specifically designed by tax lawyers to slickly get the tax avoided money into some secretive off-shore bank account.
If - as we're all in this together in one big happy society - they'd paid their fair share just think how many of the sick, elderly and dying could have had the full cost of their nursing care paid for instead of being forced into the inhumane and degrading process of DST Assessments.
He wasn't confused by any of this - capitalism is fraud on a massive scale.
Which brings us neatly on to the Ombudsman's confused belief that 1 + 2 = 0 or the, "double Ombudsman" or "double Warrrington" as its now become known in the trade.
Where:
1) the evidence + 2) the Ombudsman's decision = nothing for the complainant.
Q. Mr Javid, let's not be confused by any of this - isn't someone who doesn't look at the evidence but is still unwaveringly able to find in favour of their fee-paying Member, not purely and simply engaged in criminal activity. Or is this Ombudsism in Capitalism?
Please feel free to comment!
Yours sincerely,
Steve Gilbert - The Ombudsmans61percent Campaign.
No comments:
Post a Comment