A Genuine Respect For People. (448)

To the Business Secretary:
For Clarity - Attempt 448.

448) A Genuine Respect For People.

Dear Mr Javid,
The scandal of NHS Continuing Healthcare Funding and the scandal of the maladministration of consumers' complaints by Ombudsman Services have at least one thing in common - neither system nor the people abusing them, have much respect for people they interact with and so, according to the Oxford Dictionary's definition of justice, have little respect for justice either.

They have nothing but contempt for our justice and our democracy.

Each day they go to work to stonewall, misinform, lie to, cheat and rob us. An army of conmen and women who now have the upper hand, who will resort to any means - including maladministration - to achieve their end of calling all the shots, of domination, in what has become a quintessentially English, English Uncivil War. Trident is no deterrent to these people. They operate below the radar. The rules of the game no longer apply to them. Under cover of darkness, with great stealth and in contravention of the Geneva Convention they've succeeded in turning the level playing field into a minefield. Mercy and compassion are seen by them as signs of wimpish weakness.

"Bomber" Benn, it's time for another speech.

When it comes to the first scandal, that of CHC Funding, Dr Louise Irvine tells us,
"There is an area of healthcare that the general public in England does not know much about and our politicians would prefer to keep that way. It's only when you have a relative with a serious long term health condition that you discover the complex, unfair and inhumane system that you have to go through to get NHS funding for the care your loved one needs." (Dr Louise Irvine: Huffington Post)

Complex, unfair and inhumane.

That's exactly how it is. People - whose salaries are paid for by the taxpayer - refused to answer our questions, put us on the long finger, fed us the wrong information and then lied to us. It's still going on. Why should there be need of a, "Desk Top Review" for a dead person ? They are, after all, dead. Is it the final indignity for those who worked hard, loved their country, paid their taxes and who prided themselves on playing by the rules of the game?  

It's all in a day's work to those shameless individuals tasked with fleecing them.

The second scandal - the maladministration of consumers' complaints by Ombudsman Services - is also unnecessarily complex, unfair and inhumane with the only difference being that those who refuse to answer your questions, who put consumers on the long finger and then give them decisions that have not been arrived at in a logical manner, have their salaries paid for by the very people consumers are complaining about.

Total conflicts of interest and totally rigged markets.

With, the "Continuing Healthcare Care Funding" scandal the state, disgracefully, seeks to pass the cost of care onto the people. When it comes to private redress schemes - scams - incompetent businesses pass the cost of their incompetence very competently onto their consumers.

We believe that both are criminal conspiracies against the people of England.

Q. Mr Javid, is it treating people with genuine respect to have a taxpayer make 448 attempts at raising the issue of the maladministration of consumers' complaints by Ombudsman Services, only for them to be totally ignored by you and the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills?
Q. Mr Javid, does that mean that your department is collaborating with and covering up the maladministration of consumers' complaints by the executives at Ombudsman Services?
Q. Mr Javid, is it just good business to wrongly bill the elderly, the sick and the dying and then leave their closest relatives to attempt to claim back what was criminally taken, after they have died?
Q. Mr Javid, where is the justice in that? Is it in any meaningful way, "democratic?"

Yours sincerely,
Steve Gilbert - The Ombudsmans61percent Campaign.